![]() |
Falcon Heavy boosters landing after helping to launch Starman |
Over the past year or so, I have gradually become what could be
accurately described as a SpaceX fan. Not only that, I have discovered that
Elon Musk’s rocketry company possesses a surprisingly extensive fandom. SpaceX
has an active subreddit with hundreds of thousands of members, and its orbital
launches can draw millions of viewers on YouTube. So, what is it that has given
a private spaceflight corporation the sort of following typically reserved for
TV shows and sports teams? I can't fully answer this question in the broad,
societal sense, but I can analyze what makes SpaceX so inspiring to me
personally.
First, it's useful to understand why I find space exploration in
general so interesting and important. One factor is that establishing a human
presence outside of Earth is vital to our species' long-term survival. Relying
on a single fragile planet to house all of humanity is a risky choice in a
world where our capacity for destruction increases exponentially as our
technology advances. But this does not entirely account for the appeal of
space. After all, fighting global warming is an even more important task in the
fight to prolong humanity's lifespan. The answer lies in the fact that space
exploration is a positive endeavor. It seeks to discover and create, not simply
to correct mistakes and avert catastrophe. The preservation of Earth is at least as
important as expanding off of it, but it is difficult (for me, at least) to be
excited about such a reactive effort. Space exploration, on the other hand, is
proactively pushing the boundaries of human achievement.
Beyond the overarching goal of human self-preservation, space
exploration also offers an endless supply of new challenges which can only be
overcome by ever more advanced technology. Even with a minuscule percentage of
Earth's resources devoted to the task, it has been the arena for some of humanity's
greatest engineering accomplishments. When one considers just how much more
there is to explore and build in our solar system alone, it injects a dose of
optimism into visions of the future so often focused on human shortcomings. Not
only is it a great technological challenge, space is particularly easy to be
passionate about because of how much of humanity's recent popular culture has
been devoted to fantasizing about it. The opportunity to make real the dreams
of science fiction is yet another contributor to the allure of the cosmos.
My enthusiasm for the astronautical has been explained, but the
question remains: why SpaceX in particular? Is not NASA a better
standard-bearer for humanity's journey beyond Earth? Unfortunately, while NASA
is central to human space exploration (and was the organization which enabled
SpaceX's rise to prominence in the first place), it is no longer the agency
that landed humans on Luna and returned them to Earth barely more than a decade
after its creation. Since the days of Apollo, NASA devoted most of its efforts
to the Space Shuttle, an unsafe and enormously expensive system which completely
failed to live up to its promise of revolutionizing access to space. This
decline has a host of causes, from extremely limited funding to constantly
shifting political directives to increased monopolization in the aerospace
industry, but it boils down to the fact that NASA is no longer always the go-to
space organization, particularly when it comes to orbital launch technology.
SpaceX, on the other hand, is revolutionizing the launch industry and
developing vehicles which may allow for the practical colonization of other
worlds.
Since its very beginning, SpaceX has been rapidly making useful advances
in the otherwise rather stagnant field of orbital launch. It was the first
private company to develop and launch a liquid-fueled orbital rocket (the
Falcon 1), and soon after built on this success with the much more powerful
Falcon 9. SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft quickly became the first private vehicle
to resupply a space station, and with the Space Shuttle’s retirement was (and
still is) the only operational craft capable of returning significant amounts
of cargo from space to Earth. However, in the grand scheme these early
developments are the least of SpaceX’s successes. With later versions of the
Falcon 9, it has succeeded where NASA failed, creating a partially reusable
orbital launch system which has actually brought down costs.
![]() |
A Dragon spacecraft being grappled by the International Space Station's Canadarm2 prior to berthing |
In order to fully comprehend the magnitude of this advance, it is
important to understand the state of the American orbital launch industry
before SpaceX entered the scene. Boeing and Lockheed Martin, the two aerospace
titans who manufactured the Atlas and Delta rockets which served as the core of
American launch capabilities, had formed a joint venture know as United Launch
Alliance which gave them an almost complete monopoly on government launches.
ULA made no effort to replace its completely expendable rockets with more
advanced designs, or even to enter into the commercial satellite launch market.
Instead, it took advantage of the lack of competition to charge hundreds of
millions of dollars for every government launch (since SpaceX entered the
market, ULA’s prices have dropped dramatically). In lieu of this complacent approach, SpaceX chose to devote the effort necessary to make the first useful
advances in humanity’s ability to move payloads into orbit since the end of the
Space Race.
Despite being a fraction of the size of either Lockheed or Boeing
alone, SpaceX has created what is without a doubt the world’s most advanced
orbital launch system: the Falcon 9 Block 5. This rocket incorporates a number
of innovations, from engines with the highest thrust-to-weight ratio of any in
the world to cryogenically compressed fuel and oxidizer, but its real advantage
is its reusability. The Falcon 9’s capability to propulsively land its first
stage after boosting its second stage much of the way to orbit is
unprecedented, and it promises to make the Falcon 9 significantly cheaper than
rockets which are thrown away after a single use. Already, a majority of
SpaceX’s launches use previously-flown stages, and now that the Block 5
improvements have been fully implemented individual stages should be able to
last for dozens of launches. These capabilities have given SpaceX lower prices
than any other launch provider in the same weight class and forced the rest of
the industry back into innovation. Even beyond reusability, the Falcon Heavy
variant of SpaceX’s flagship rocket is currently the most powerful orbital
launch system in operation.
![]() |
Falcon Heavy's maiden launch |
SpaceX’s past achievements and current capabilities are
impressive, but its plans for the future are even more inspiring. Later this year, SpaceX will likely use its new Dragon 2 spacecraft to launch astronauts from American soil for the first time since the retirement of the Space Shuttle. Starship
(formerly BFR, previously ITS, and originally MCT), the company’s next major
project, is an ingenious design which will make clever use of methane propellant,
orbital refueling, reusability, in-situ resource utilization, and aerobraking
to create an interplanetary vehicle capable of supporting major colonization
efforts at relatively low cost without employing politically difficult
technologies like nuclear thermal rockets. This may sound far-fetched, but at
this very moment SpaceX is assembling prototype hardware with which to conduct
suborbital hop tests as early as March of this year. It’s also useful to
remember that the sort of propulsive recovery and reuse of first stages which
is now routine was considered impractical by many in the years before it was
accomplished. SpaceX has an established track record of achieving the
previously-thought-impossible (if usually a few years behind schedule), and if
it does succeed, Starship has the potential to revolutionize interplanetary
exploration in the same way Falcon 9 is disrupting the launch industry today.
There is one more vital element to consider if my admiration of
SpaceX is to be fully understood: its sense of humor. Essentially alone among
space companies (and major corporations in general, not to mention government
agencies), SpaceX possesses a real sense of fun and self-deprecation.
Before being dubbed Starship, its interplanetary spacecraft was known as
BFR, in which the B stood for Big and the R for Rocket (the word symbolized by
the F is left to the reader’s imagination). The SpaceX YouTube channel contains
a video entitled “How Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster” which is made up
primarily of footage of the countless landing failures which proceeded Falcon
9’s eventual success, all set to the same music used in the opening of Monty Python’s Flying Circus. Most
infamously, SpaceX used a rather unorthodox dummy payload on the test flight of
Falcon Heavy. It is standard practice in the industry for rockets to carry large
hunks of iron or similar ballast on their first flight, in order to simulate
the weight of a payload without jeopardizing valuable hardware on an untested
system. SpaceX, however, decided to use Elon Musk’s cherry red Tesla Roadster,
with a dummy in a spacesuit nicknamed “Starman” slouched in a driver’s seat and
a copy of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the
Galaxy in the glove compartment. Launched into a heliocentric orbit,
cameras on the car broadcast hours of stunning live footage of Starman casually
drifting far above Earth. In a field so often dominated by stodgy officials and earnest narratives, it’s hard not to find such antics on the part of a company
which is also making major advances at least a little endearing.
Much of the historical verdict on SpaceX will depend on the final outcome of its current grand plans. It has achieved the seemingly impossible in the past, but establishing a viable human presence on Mars is quite a few steps beyond anything it has attempted before. Even if its dreams of interplanetary colonization end in failure, SpaceX will have revolutionized the way humanity gets to space and injected a welcome dose of whimsy into the astronautical industry.
First of all, I would like to say that this piece is incredibly well-written, so kudos to you! I thought your point about the proactiveness of venturing into space as opposed to simply mitigating current issues was especially interesting (although the whole article was fascinating and informative, in my opinion). Because Elon Musk is the face of SpaceX, do you think his growing list of controversies will impact SpaceX's future successes one way or another?
ReplyDeleteAlso, would you, like Wildbow, be open to a typo thread?
First, sorry I didn't get to answering this for so long. The notification email went to the wrong inbox. Anyway, I think Musk's antics are definitely a bit of an issue, particularly given how much of SpaceX's business comes from the government. The Air Force specifically is already a bit leery of the company, and he's certainly not helping. On the other hand, if your experience with Musk is entirely within the realm of SpaceX (as mine was for a while) he actually comes off as very likable in my view. This video is a good example of that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu7WJD8vpAQ&t=1s
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, that's always welcome.